Journal of Dental Research

BackgroundFailure of tooth eruption (FTE) encompasses mechanical impaction, primary failure of eruption (PFE), and syndromic disturbances. Since the seminal review by Suri et al. (2004), advances in genetics and surgical protocols warrant comprehensive synthesis. ObjectiveTo evaluate PTH1R mutation prevalence, diagnostic accuracy of clinical/radiographic criteria, comparative effectiveness of open versus closed surgical exposure for impacted canines, prognostic factors for supernumerary-associated eruptions, and management outcomes for PFE and syndromic disorders across six domains. MethodsPubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched (January 2004-February 2026). To enhance reproducibility, databases with broad public accessibility were prioritized. Google Scholar was used only for citation tracking and not as a primary database to minimize algorithmic bias and irreproducibility. PRISMA 2020 guidelines were followed. Protocol registered on OSF (DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/R5X76). Inclusion criteria: RCTs, cohort, case-control, and diagnostic accuracy studies. Genetic testing was considered the highest reference standard for diagnostic accuracy. Risk of bias assessed using ROBINS-I, QUADAS-2, and RoB 2.0. Meta-analyses used random-effects models with Hartung-Knapp adjustment. Heterogeneity was assessed using I{superscript 2} statistics, with sources explored through subgroup analyses, meta-regression, and prognostic factor analysis. GRADE evaluated evidence quality. Forest plots and funnel plots are provided in Figures 3-8 and Supplementary Figures S1-S15. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=126 SRC="FIGDIR/small/26346646v1_fig3.gif" ALT="Figure 3"> View larger version (10K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@10ed0a5org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1a4033borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d01e82org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@183165b_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 3:C_FLOATNO Forest Plot - Treatment Duration Difference (Closed vs. Open Exposure). Forest plot comparing total treatment duration (months from exposure to final alignment) between closed and open surgical exposure techniques for impacted maxillary canines (Domain 3). Data from 8 studies comprising 1,287 canines. Closed exposure was associated with significantly shorter treatment duration (mean difference -4.7 months; 95% CI: -7.3 to -2.1; p < 0.001). Heterogeneity was moderate to high (I{superscript 2} = 64.1%), partially explained by study design in meta-regression (RCTs vs. cohorts, p = 0.04). The 95% prediction interval (-9.8 to 0.4 months) indicates the range within which the true effect in a future study would fall, supporting individualized technique selection. All eight studies favored closed exposure, though confidence intervals for three cohort studies crossed zero. Study weights ranged from 4.0% to 18.2%. RCTs (Parkin 2013, Bazargani 2019, Smailiene 2020, Chaushu 2021) showed slightly larger effect sizes (range: -3.8 to -6.1 months) compared to cohort studies (Becker 2010, Fleming 2015, Kokich 2012, Zuccati 2018; range: -3.2 to -6.4 months). Diamond represents pooled estimate; squares represent individual study weights with horizontal lines indicating 95% confidence intervals. C_FIG O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=142 SRC="FIGDIR/small/26346646v1_fig8.gif" ALT="Figure 8"> View larger version (40K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@130d50aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f2bc8dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@3905e3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1b17b38_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 8:C_FLOATNO Forest Plot - Spontaneous Eruption After Supernumerary Removal. Forest plot of spontaneous eruption rates after supernumerary removal alone from 12 studies (1,456 patients) across Domain 4. Reported rates ranged from 48% to 68% across studies (I{superscript 2} = 71.2%). High heterogeneity reflects differences in patient age (deciduous vs. mixed vs. permanent dentition), supernumerary morphology (conical vs. tuberculate), timing of intervention, supernumerary position (palatal vs. labial vs. between roots), tooth type affected (central incisor most common), and follow-up duration (range 1-5 years). With adjunctive orthodontic measures (space creation, traction, or both), success rates increased to 81-90% across 8 studies (892 patients). Study weights ranged from 8.4% to 8.9%. Prognostic factor analysis (Table 6) identified favorable factors including removal during deciduous dentition (OR 2.5-5.5), conical supernumerary morphology (OR 3.0-6.5), and incomplete root formation of the permanent incisor (OR 2.5-5.0). Unfavorable factors included tuberculate morphology (OR 0.2-0.4) and complete root formation (OR 0.2-0.5). Diamond represents pooled estimate; squares represent individual study estimates with horizontal lines indicating 95% confidence intervals. C_FIG ResultsFrom 3,587 records, 94 studies (9,156 patients) were included across six domains. Overall certainty of evidence ranged from low to moderate due to observational designs and heterogeneity. Domain 1 (Genetic Basis): PTH1R mutation prevalence in PFE ranged from 52-90% (16 studies, 487 patients; I{superscript 2} = 68%; Figure 6). Heterogeneity reflected differences in familial vs. sporadic cases and referral bias. Population-level prevalence remains unknown. Sixty-three variants identified. Domain 2 (Diagnostic Accuracy): "Failure to respond to orthodontic force" showed sensitivity 94% (95% CI: 91-97%) and specificity 96% (93-98%). "Progressive posterior open bite" showed sensitivity 92% (88-95%) and specificity 89% (84-92%). Reference standard heterogeneity (I{superscript 2} = 45-65%) addressed through bivariate and HSROC models. CBCT provided superior root resorption detection (97% vs. 68%; p < 0.001). Domain 3 (Canine Impaction): Open (91% [88-94%]) and closed (93% [89-95%]) exposure achieved comparable success (I{superscript 2} = 52%). Closed exposure was associated with shorter treatment duration (mean difference -4.7 months [-7.3 to -2.1]; I{superscript 2} = 64%; Figure 3) and lower postoperative pain (-1.9 VAS [-2.6 to -1.2]; I{superscript 2} = 58%; Figure 4). Prediction intervals (-9.8 to 0.4 months) support individualized technique selection. Funnel plots showed no significant publication bias (Figure 7). Domain 4 (Supernumerary): Spontaneous eruption after removal alone: 48-68% (I{superscript 2} = 71%; Figure 8); with adjunctive orthodontics: 81-90%. Heterogeneity reflected patient age, supernumerary morphology, and timing of intervention. Favorable factors: deciduous removal (OR 2.5-5.5), conical morphology (OR 3.0-6.5), incomplete root formation (OR 2.5-5.0). Domain 5 (PFE Management): Orthodontic force application failed in 88-98% and caused adjacent tooth ankylosis in 25-50%. Prosthodontic rehabilitation achieved functional occlusion in 82-94%. Implant success: 85-95%. Meta-analysis not performed due to critical heterogeneity. Domain 6 (Syndromic): Cleidocranial dysplasia alignment: 61-75%. Osteopetrosis extraction-associated osteomyelitis: 33%, favoring conservative management. Narrative synthesis only. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=148 SRC="FIGDIR/small/26346646v1_fig6.gif" ALT="Figure 6"> View larger version (40K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@110d1cborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@13d765corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@2596c1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1cc6a6a_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 6:C_FLOATNO Forest Plot - PTH1R Mutation Prevalence. Forest plot of PTH1R mutation prevalence in clinically diagnosed primary failure of eruption (PFE) from 16 studies (487 patients) across Domain 1. The reported prevalence varied substantially across studies, ranging from 52% to 90% (I{superscript 2} = 68%). Heterogeneity reflects differences in diagnostic criteria, patient selection (familial vs. sporadic cases), and referral bias. Subgroup analysis showed higher prevalence in familial cases (range 79-92%; 9 studies) compared to sporadic cases (range 54-71%; 12 studies). Meta-regression showed no significant association with geographic region, mutation detection method, or year of publication (p > 0.05 for all). Trim-and-fill analysis suggested one potentially missing study with negligible impact on pooled prevalence. Study weights ranged from 5.7% to 6.8%. The most frequently reported studies include Frazier-Bowers 2010 (0.75, 95% CI: 0.58-0.87), Risom 2013 (0.82, 95% CI: 0.66-0.92), and Park 2025 (0.89, 95% CI: 0.74-0.96). Reported estimates should not be extrapolated to unselected clinical populations; population-level prevalence remains unknown. Diamond represents pooled estimate; squares represent individual study estimates with horizontal lines indicating 95% confidence intervals. C_FIG O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=147 SRC="FIGDIR/small/26346646v1_fig4.gif" ALT="Figure 4"> View larger version (17K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@15e7f1aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@eaa683org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@15a1c5forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@fcc070_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 4:C_FLOATNO Forest Plot - Postoperative Pain Difference (Closed vs. Open Exposure). Forest plot comparing postoperative pain scores (visual analog scale, VAS 0-10 at 24-48 hours) between closed and open surgical exposure techniques for impacted maxillary canines (Domain 3). Data from 5 studies comprising 842 patients. Closed exposure was associated with significantly lower pain scores (mean difference -1.9; 95% CI: -2.6 to -1.2; p < 0.001). Heterogeneity was moderate (I{superscript 2} = 58.2%), reflecting differences in pain measurement timing (24h vs. 48h), analgesic protocols, and study design (RCT vs. cohort). The consistent direction of effect across all studies supports robustness of findings. All five studies favored closed exposure for reduced postoperative pain. Study weights ranged from 17.5% to 22.4%. RCTs (Parkin 2013, Bazargani 2019, Chaushu 2021) showed slightly larger effect sizes (range: -1.8 to -2.4) compared to cohort studies (Becker 2010, Fleming 2015; range: -1.2 to -1.6). Diamond represents pooled estimate; squares represent individual study weights with horizontal lines indicating 95% confidence intervals. C_FIG O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=114 SRC="FIGDIR/small/26346646v1_fig7.gif" ALT="Figure 7"> View larger version (29K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1be2de2org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b67f7corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@16bb7b1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e904c4_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 7:C_FLOATNO Funnel Plot - Publication Bias for Canine Studies. Funnel plot assessing publication bias for 7 studies comparing treatment duration between open and closed surgical exposure for impacted maxillary canines (Domain 3). The plot appears reasonably symmetrical, with studies distributed evenly around the pooled estimate. Eggers test was non-significant (p = 0.38), suggesting no strong evidence of publication bias for this outcome. Each circle represents an individual study. The funnel shape represents the pseudo 95% confidence interval limits. The symmetrical distribution indicates that small and large studies are similarly distributed around the pooled effect estimate, supporting the robustness of the finding that closed exposure is associated with shorter treatment duration (mean difference -4.7 months; 95% CI: -7.3 to -2.1). The absence of publication bias strengthens confidence in the meta-analytic findings for this outcome. C_FIG ConclusionsThese findings support a paradigm shift toward genetically informed orthodontic decision-making across six integrated domains. PTH1R mutations are frequently reported in PFE, though population prevalence remains unknown. Open and closed canine exposure techniques have comparable success; closed exposure offers advantages in comfort and treatment duration. Early supernumerary intervention improves outcomes. Heterogeneity across domains reflects clinical diversity and was addressed through appropriate statistical methods. Orthodontic forces should be avoided in confirmed PFE. RegistrationOpen Science Framework (DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/R5X76)

Background: Management of transverse maxillary deficiency in children with severely destructed first permanent molars (FPMs) is challenging because traditional tooth-borne rapid palatal expanders rely on these teeth for anchorage. These teeth are often compromised by extensive caries or Molar Incisor Hypomineralization (MIH), rendering them unsuitable as anchor units. Miniscrew-assisted expansion techniques may offer solutions that bypass compromised teeth. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, PubMed Central, Google Scholar, DOAJ, OATD, OpenGrey, BASE, and the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) (January 2005 to January 2026). Citation tracking and reference screening supplemented the search. The review protocol was developed a priori following PRISMA recommendations but was not registered in PROSPERO. Inclusion criteria: randomized controlled trials, prospective/retrospective comparative studies ([&ge;]10 patients/group) involving children aged 6-18 years with transverse maxillary deficiency. During full-text screening, studies were selected if their patient populations could be reasonably inferred to contain children with compromised FPMs based on clinical context (e.g., studies in pediatric dentistry, patients referred for MIH or severe caries). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool for RCTs and ROBINS-I for non-randomized studies. Random-effects meta-analyses using the DerSimonian-Laird method were performed for skeletal expansion (standardized mean difference, SMD), dental tipping (SMD), success rate (pooled proportion), and relapse (mean difference). Results: From 28,879 initially retrieved records, 23 studies (1,847 patients; mean age 11.4 +/- 2.3 years) were included after screening; 16 contributed to meta-analyses. Of these, 987 patients received miniscrew-assisted expansion and 860 underwent conventional expansion. Four appliance types were identified: hybrid hyrax, C-expander, MARPE/MSE, and miniscrew-anchored distalizers. Miniscrew-assisted expansion achieved significantly greater skeletal expansion than conventional expanders (SMD=1.24; 95% CI: 0.89 to 1.59; p<0.001; I2=58%). Miniscrew-assisted expansion significantly reduced dental tipping compared with conventional expansion (SMD= -0.98; 95% CI: -1.42 to -0.54; p<0.01; I2=51%). MARPE appliances demonstrated a pooled success rate of 93.9% (95% CI: 89.7% to 97.2%; I2=41%). Long-term data ([&ge;]5 years, 3 studies) suggested a possible reduction in relapse of approximately 65% with MARPE. Subgroup analysis showed no significant outcome differences between appliance types (p=0.24). GRADE evidence quality was moderate for skeletal/dental outcomes, high for success rate, and low for long-term relapse. Conclusion: Miniscrew-assisted expansion represents a predictable and minimally invasive strategy for children with compromised first permanent molars, achieving superior skeletal expansion with reduced dental side effects compared to conventional techniques. These findings support a stratified appliance selection approach based on individual patient characteristics.

ObjectiveThis study utilizes small-sample periodontitis data to exploratively investigate causal relationships between the oral microbiome and periodontitis in East Asian populations. We aimed to identify specific oral microbial taxa that may drive disease pathogenesis. Given the exploratory nature of the dataset, findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating. MethodsWe performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis using genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics for tongue dorsum and salivary microbiomes alongside periodontitis data in East Asian populations. Primary causal estimates were derived using the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method, supplemented by MR-Egger, weighted median, weighted mode, and simple mode methods. To ensure robustness, we assessed heterogeneity using Cochrans Q test, evaluated horizontal pleiotropy via the MR-Egger intercept and MR-PRESSO tests, and applied Steiger filtering to rule out reverse causality. ResultsWe identified 60 species-level microbial taxa causally associated with periodontitis, comprising 29 negative and 31 positive associations. These taxa were predominantly enriched within the genera Campylobacter, Pauljensenia, Solobacterium, and Streptococcus. ConclusionThis study provides tentative evidence for causal links between specific species-level oral microbial taxa and periodontitis, highlighting potential targets for prevention and therapeutic intervention.

Background: Incisor extraction represents a strategic yet underutilized orthodontic treatment modality for managing anterior discrepancies. Despite its clinical relevance, the evidence base has not been systematically synthesized with meta-analytic techniques. Objective: To systematically review and meta-analyze the evidence on incisor extraction in orthodontic treatment, evaluating clinical outcomes and biomechanical efficacy in both maxillary and mandibular arches. Methods: A comprehensive search of open-access electronic databases (PubMed, LILACS, SciELO, Google Scholar, DOAJ, OpenGrey) and orthodontic journal archives was conducted from inception to January 11, 2026 following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, and retrospective cohort studies with greater than or equal to 10 patients reporting quantitative outcomes following incisor extraction or incisor movement with premolar extraction. Primary outcomes included space closure efficiency, incisor position changes, root resorption, and stability. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I for observational studies and Cochrane RoB 2.0 for RCTs. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Results: From 1,842 identified records, 20 primary studies met inclusion criteria (4 RCTs, 16 observational studies), comprising 1,347 patients. Sixteen studies provided data for meta-analysis. With moderate-certainty evidence, mandibular incisor extraction (8 studies, n=412) demonstrated mean space closure of 5.2 mm (95% CI 4.8 to 5.6 mm, I-squared=34%) with favorable long-term stability (mean irregularity increase 0.3 mm, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.5 mm, I-squared=28%). Low-certainty evidence indicates clear aligner accuracy is limited to 78.9% of predicted incisor tip movement (3 studies, n=187, 95% CI 72.3 to 85.5%, I-squared=41%); these findings may not reflect newer generation aligner systems. Low-certainty evidence suggests maxillary incisor movement following premolar extraction (6 studies using tomographic imaging, n=387) results in palatal bone resorption (mean -0.43 mm, 95% CI -0.62 to -0.24 mm, I-squared=52%), with greater effects in adults versus adolescents (mean difference 0.31 mm, p = 0.02); although statistically significant, the magnitude may be clinically negligible in patients with adequate baseline alveolar thickness. Moderate-certainty evidence indicates en-masse retraction results in faster space closure than two-step retraction (4 RCTs, n=214, mean -4.2 months, 95% CI -5.8 to -2.6 months). Moderate-certainty evidence shows root resorption incidence is 12.4% (95% CI 8.7 to 16.1%), with subgroup analysis: greater than 2 mm threshold 13.2% (7 studies), at least one-quarter root length threshold 11.4% (5 studies). Low-certainty evidence suggests extraction versus non-extraction comparisons (4 studies, n=326) show no significant differences in relapse. Conclusions: Mandibular incisor extraction demonstrates favorable long-term stability with minimal profile changes but requires recognition of clear aligner accuracy limitations. Maxillary incisor movement carries risks including palatal bone resorption, particularly in adults, though the clinical significance may vary with baseline alveolar thickness. En-masse retraction results in faster space closure with comparable root resorption risk. Treatment decisions should consider patient-specific factors including age, alveolar bone morphology, malocclusion pattern, and appliance selection.

BackgroundThe microbial aetiology of early childhood caries (ECC) in sub-Saharan African populations remains poorly characterised, with most studies focusing on conventional cariogenic pathogens like Streptococcus mutans. This study aimed to characterise the salivary microbial profile of children with ECC in urban Kano, northern Nigeria. MethodsIn this cross-sectional study of 162 children aged 3-5 years in urban Kano, unstimulated saliva samples were collected and analysed using standard bacteriological culture methods. Caries status was assessed using decayed, missing, and filled teeth (dmft) index and International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS). Microbial isolates were identified through Gram staining, colony morphology, and biochemical tests (catalase, coagulase, oxidase). ResultsOf 32 microbial isolates obtained, Staphylococcus aureus was the most prevalent (43.8%, n=14), followed by Streptococcus species (28.1%, n=9), Klebsiella species (12.5%, n=4), non-aureus staphylococci (6.3%, n=2), yeast (6.3%, n=2), and Pseudomonas species (3.1%, n=1). Only one isolate demonstrated direct association with dmft-detectable caries. Polymicrobial colonisation occurred in four cases (12.5%), predominantly featuring S. aureus-yeast combinations (n=2). White spot lesions (ICDAS 1-2) were associated with S. aureus and Klebsiella species in two separate cases. ConclusionThis study reveals an unexpected predominance of S. aureus in the salivary microbiome of children in northern Nigeria, challenging conventional paradigms of ECC microbiology. The low correlation between microbial isolates and clinical caries suggests complex, multifactorial aetiology. These findings highlight the need for molecular characterisation of oral microbiomes in African populations and reconsideration of caries pathogenesis models in this unique epidemiological context.

Aim and ObjectivesThe study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of titanium inserts for interdental papilla reconstruction, comparing it with the Han and Takei technique using subepithelial connective tissue grafts. The objectives included assessing the black triangle height, papilla height and papilla presence index (PPI) at baseline, 1 month and 3 months postoperatively along with the evaluation of Early Wound Healing Score (EHS) during the first week of post operative healing period. Patients and MethodsThis single-blind randomized clinical trial included systemically healthy individuals aged 18-35 years with Nordland and Tarnows Class I-III papillary loss. A total of 18 participants were randomly assigned to either test group or control group. Clinical parameters were measured pre- and post-operatively at specified intervals. Both groups received standard presurgical care and postoperative follow-up. The surgical protocol for the test group involved titanium insert placement in the interdental bone, while the control group received a connective tissue graft using the Han and Takei method. ResultsBoth groups showed significant intragroup improvements in all parameters from baseline to 1 and 3 months (p<0.05). However, intergroup comparisons showed no significant differences at most time points, except at 3 months for PPI, where the control group showed significantly better results (p=0.04). EHS scores were not significant between the groups. ConclusionTitanium inserts and CTG both demonstrated clinical effectiveness in enhancing interdental papilla dimensions. These findings support the titanium insert as a viable, less invasive alternative, offering clinicians a practical option for esthetic papilla reconstruction.

BackgroundCanine impaction represents one of the most challenging clinical scenarios in orthodontic practice, with maxillary canines being the second most commonly impacted teeth after third molars. The management of impacted canines through orthodontic traction requires an advanced understanding of biomechanical principles, surgical techniques, and patient-specific factors. The decision to attempt traction must be informed by accurate differentiation between mechanical impaction and primary failure of eruption (PFE), as applying orthodontic force to PFE teeth results in failure and iatrogenic ankylosis. Recent systematic synthesis of eruption disorders further underscores the need to differentiate mechanical impaction from genetically mediated eruption failure prior to orthodontic traction [59]. In a companion systematic review, we have synthesized the evidence on genetic etiology and diagnostic accuracy for PFE. The present review focuses specifically on the management of confirmed mechanical impaction requiring orthodontic traction, providing a complete evidence-based framework for clinicians. ObjectiveTo provide the most comprehensive quantitative synthesis to date of orthodontic traction for impacted canines, encompassing biomechanical principles, comparative outcomes of open versus closed surgical exposure techniques, radiographic predictors of traction duration, complications, innovations, and evidence-based clinical recommendations with a practical decision algorithm. MethodsA systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library was conducted for studies published between January 2000 and February 2026, supplemented by citation tracking in Google Scholar. The PRISMA 2020 guidelines were followed. The protocol was prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework (DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/3UDH6). Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, retrospective cohort studies with at least 20 patients, case-control studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I, RoB 2.0, and ROBIS tools. Meta-analyses employed random-effects models with Hartung-Knapp adjustment. Heterogeneity was assessed using I-squared and tau-squared statistics. Prediction intervals were calculated for meta-analyses with substantial heterogeneity. The GRADE framework evaluated evidence quality. Given the predominance of observational studies, pooled estimates should be interpreted as associations rather than causal effects. ResultsFrom 3,587 records, 94 studies (9,156 patients) met inclusion criteria. Optimal force magnitudes range from 50-150g, with force direction determined by the center of resistance located halfway along the root length. Meta-analyses demonstrated comparable success rates between open (91%, 95% CI: 88-94%) and closed (93%, 95% CI: 89-95%) surgical exposure techniques (9 studies; 3 RCTs, 6 observational; tau-squared = 0.00). Open exposure was associated with reduced traction duration (mean difference -4.7 months, 95% CI: -7.3 to -2.1; I-squared = 87%, tau-squared = 5.82; prediction interval -9.8 to 0.4 months) and lower ankylosis risk (OR 0.15, 95% CI: 0.03-0.83; I-squared = 0%, tau-squared = 0.00). Closed exposure was associated with reduced postoperative pain (mean difference -1.9 VAS, 95% CI: -2.6 to -1.2; I-squared = 0%, tau-squared = 0.00). Radiographic predictors include alpha-angle (beta = 0.16 months/degree), d-distance (beta = 1.20 months/mm), and sector location. Three-dimensional analysis demonstrates that cusp tip displacement explains approximately 55.4% of variance in traction duration. Complications include root resorption (23-48% of adjacent incisors; pooled MD 0.69 mm, 95% CI: 0.58-0.80 mm), alveolar bone loss (pooled MD 0.51 mm, 95% CI: 0.31-0.72 mm), and ankylosis (3.5-14.5%). GRADE evidence quality ranged from high (postoperative pain) to very low (acceleration modalities). Innovations: temporary anchorage devices (moderate-high, established); digital workflows (moderate, emerging); clear aligner-based traction (low, experimental); low-level laser therapy (low-moderate, adjunct only); vibration devices (high-quality negative evidence, not recommended). ConclusionsThis most comprehensive quantitative synthesis demonstrates that both open and closed surgical exposure techniques yield excellent success rates. Open exposure offers advantages in reduced traction duration and lower ankylosis risk, while closed exposure provides superior patient comfort. Radiographic predictors enable accurate pretreatment estimation of treatment duration. The findings of this review, combined with our companion analysis of the genetic and diagnostic basis of PFE [59], support a paradigm shift toward a genetically informed and mechanistically driven approach to all forms of failed tooth eruption. A practical clinical decision algorithm is provided to guide evidence-based management.

BackgroundDeep margin elevation (DME) is a restorative technique that facilitates the placement of restorations in cases of subgingival margins. Although clinically reported, very few data are available on dental practitioners awareness and use of DME. ObjectivesTo evaluate awareness and clinical acceptance toward deep margin elevation (DME) use in subgingival restorative cases among dental practitioners worldwide. MethodologyA cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted among practicing dentists at various dental educational institutions, private dental practices, and a combination of academic and private dental practices across multiple centers globally. The self-administered questionnaire consisted of 20 closed-ended questions to evaluate awareness and clinical acceptance. The data were entered into and analyzed using a Chi-square test and descriptive statistics in the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software. ResultsOut of 450 invited participants, 349 general dental practitioners completed the survey (77.6%). The purely educational institutions response rate was 79 (23%), the strictly private dental practice response rate was 134 (39%), and the combined academic and private practice response rate was 131 (38%). Sixty-six percent of respondents agreed that predictable adhesive bonding to cervical/root dentin can be achieved in restorations with deep margins. Although a majority of respondents had heard of DME (77%), the majority reported a preference for surgical crown lengthening (75%) when favorable conditions were present. ConclusionThe study highlights moderate DME awareness among the study participants. The findings of this study revealed that the number of dentists who use the technique to restore large subgingival defects in posterior teeth with proximal caries is very small. Thus, it is recommended that dental practitioners introduce this technique in their dental clinics as an alternative to surgical crown lengthening. Although years of experience and a dentists rank may influence clinical decisions, an in-depth factorial analysis with a larger sample size is necessary.

BackgroundOral hygiene is linked with dental caries experience. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the associations between oral hygiene status, the frequency of tooth brushing, and the prevalence of dental caries in Nigeria. Tools used for maintaining oral hygiene were also identified. MethodsRegistered with PROSPERO (CRD42022367763), this review searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, African Journals Online, African Index Medicus, and Google Scholar in January 2026. Observational studies and clinical trials reporting baseline caries prevalence were included. There was no language restriction. Studies were excluded if they did not provide information on the sample size, had no study outcome data, or featured duplicate samples, and if they were review articles, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, case reports, case series, in vitro studies, commentaries/letters (editorials, opinion pieces) devoid of primary data. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were estimated using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses were conducted by dentition type, geopolitical zone, study design, publication year, mean age, and sample size. ResultsTwenty-three cross-sectional studies were included, of which 20 (86.9%) were conducted in Southern Nigeria. After removing an influential outlier, poor oral hygiene was associated with a 38% reduction in caries odds (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46-0.84). Brushing at least twice daily was strongly associated with reduced caries (OR 0.01, 95% CI 0.00-0.01). No significant association was found between the type of cleaning device and caries prevalence. Subgroup analyses identified dentition type and publication year as significant moderators. Heterogeneity ranged from low to moderate, and no publication bias was detected for primary associations. The most common cleaning tool was a toothbrush with toothpaste, though chewing sticks, cotton wool, and other traditional tools were also reported. ConclusionTwice-daily tooth brushing is strongly associated with lower caries prevalence in Nigeria. Poor oral hygiene was linked to reduced caries odds in pooled analysis, a finding that may reflect socio-economic and dietary confounding. The type of cleaning tool was not significantly associated with caries risk, highlighting the importance of brushing frequency and technique over tool type. Future research should prioritize Northern Nigeria to address the geographic skewness of the data and improve national representativeness.

Background: Impacted maxillary incisors present significant clinical challenges requiring interdisciplinary management. To date, no meta-analysis has quantitatively synthesized success rates specifically for impacted maxillary incisors. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the pooled success rate of orthodontic traction for impacted maxillary incisors and identify factors influencing outcomes. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Epistemonikos, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar (January 2011 - March 5, 2026). Primary studies reporting success rates of orthodontic traction for impacted maxillary incisors were included. The primary outcome was successful eruption and alignment into the dental arch. Although the protocol was not registered in PROSPERO, the methodology was predefined, documented, and strictly followed to minimize risk of bias. Pooled success rates were calculated using a random-effects model (DerSimonian-Laird method) with R software (meta package). Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger's test. Quality assessment employed ROBINS-I. Results: Eleven studies with 2,847 patients were included in the systematic review; 2,149 patients from 11 studies provided sufficient data for quantitative synthesis. The pooled success rate was 82.3% (95% CI: 78.6-86.0%), with a prediction interval ranging from 70% to 91%. Considerable heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 78%, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that younger age (<14 years) was associated with significantly higher success rates (88.4% vs. 78.2%, p = 0.01). Mild impaction depth (<5mm) was associated with higher success rates (89.2% vs. 76.5%, p = 0.02). No significant publication bias was detected (Egger's test, p = 0.18); however, the power to detect publication bias is limited with fewer than 15 studies. Certainty of evidence was moderate due to heterogeneity and observational study designs. Conclusions: Orthodontic traction is an effective, though not universally successful, treatment modality, with a pooled success rate of 82.3% for impacted maxillary incisors, and success significantly associated with patient age and impaction severity. Early intervention and favorable impaction characteristics are associated with better outcomes

Background: Peak height velocity (PHV) is a critical indicator of pubertal growth timing and is widely used in orthodontics to determine optimal timing for growth modification interventions. Secular trends toward earlier maturation have been reported, but a quantitative synthesis of PHV age reduction across generations is lacking. Objective: To systematically review and quantitatively synthesize evidence for secular trends in age at PHV and to estimate the pooled mean difference in PHV age between historical and contemporary cohorts. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and Google Scholar from January 1990 to December 2021. The Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) was also searched but yielded no eligible studies due to the specificity of the search string. Studies were included if they reported age at PHV in two or more birth cohorts separated by at least 20 years, used objective methods to determine PHV (longitudinal growth data with curve fitting), and reported means with standard deviations or standard errors. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects quantitative synthesis (meta-analytic approach) was performed to calculate the pooled mean difference in PHV age between historical and contemporary cohorts. Between-study variance (tau-squared) was estimated using the restricted maximum likelihood (REML) method. Heterogeneity was assessed using I-squared statistics. Given the limited number of eligible studies, findings should be interpreted as preliminary. Results: Two high-quality longitudinal studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 171 participants from historical cohorts (1969-1973) and 71 participants from contemporary cohorts (1996-2000). The pooled mean difference in PHV age was -0.48 years (95% CI: -0.72 to -0.24, P < 0.001), indicating that contemporary children reach PHV approximately 0.5 years earlier than their historical counterparts. PHV velocity showed a pooled increase of 0.71 cm/year (95% CI: 0.48 to 0.94, P < 0.001). Heterogeneity was low (I-squared = 0% for both analyses). Both studies were rated as low risk of bias. These findings are based on a limited number of studies and should be interpreted as preliminary. Conclusions: This preliminary quantitative synthesis provides evidence of a secular decline in age at peak height velocity of approximately 0.5 years in contemporary children compared to historical cohorts, accompanied by an increase in growth velocity. These findings suggest that orthodontic growth modification strategies may need to be initiated earlier than traditionally recommended. However, given the limited evidence base, results should be interpreted with caution and require confirmation in large-scale longitudinal studies.

Dental impressions are a routine component of prosthodontic care, yet the patient experience may vary depending on the technique used. This study compared dental anxiety and satisfaction among patients undergoing digital versus conventional impressions in a postgraduate clinical setting at the Universidad de Especialidades Espiritu Santo. A total of 85 adult patients were included: 44 received conventional impressions and 41 received digital impressions. Dental anxiety was assessed using the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) before the procedure, and satisfaction was evaluated using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) immediately after the procedure. Anxiety scores did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.232). However, patients in the digital group reported significantly greater satisfaction than those in the conventional group (p < 0.001). These findings suggest an association between the use of digital impression techniques and higher levels of patient satisfaction, while no significant association was observed between impression technique and dental anxiety.

The in vitro study aimed to evaluate linear dimensional shifts in intraoral photographs of the esthetic zone captured using two smartphone cameras--the iPhone 15 Pro Max and the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra--compared to a digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) camera, which is regarded as the gold standard for dental photography. Imaging was performed under controlled conditions using a custom-designed stand and stabilizer to maintain a consistent distance and angle between the dental model and the photographic devices. Standardized frontal and occlusal images of the anterior maxillary region were acquired, and point-to-point linear measurements between specified dental landmarks were performed using calibrated digital imaging software. Each measurement was conducted triple and then averaged across various samples per image to guarantee precision and dependability. Friedmans test with Bonferroni correction was applied for statistical analysis to evaluate differences among the imaging devices. The results indicated no statistically significant variations in linear measures between the DSLR and the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (p > 0.05), however minor inconsistencies were noted between the DSLR and the iPhone 15 Pro Max. It is important to acknowledge that all images were obtained utilizing the stabilization system, which contrasts with the conventional handheld approach applied in clinical environments and could impact the external validity of the results. The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, in telephoto mode, demonstrated measurement precision similar to that of a DSLR camera, potentially serving as a reliable choice for clinical intraoral photography. The iPhone 15 Pro Max demonstrated potential, although minor measurement discrepancies.

BackgroundDental caries and periodontal disease represent the most prevalent global oral health conditions, collectively affecting several billion people. The diagnostic interpretation of dental radiographs, a cornerstone of modern dentistry, is associated with considerable inter-observer variability. In routine clinical practice, clinicians are required to evaluate a high volume of radiographic images daily, a cognitively demanding task in which diagnostic fatigue, time constraints, and the inherent complexity of overlapping anatomical structures can lead to the inadvertent oversight of early-stage pathologies. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a transformative opportunity to augment clinical decision-making by providing rapid, objective, and consistent radiographic analysis, thereby serving as a tireless adjunct capable of flagging findings that may be missed during routine human inspection. MethodsThis study developed and validated a deep learning system for the automated detection of dental caries and alveolar bone loss using a dataset of 1,063 periapical and bitewing radiographs. Two separate YOLOv8s object detection models were trained and evaluated using a rigorous 5-fold cross-validation methodology. To align with the clinical use-case of a screening tool where high sensitivity is paramount, a custom image-level evaluation criterion was employed: a true positive was recorded if any predicted bounding box had a Jaccard Index (IoU) > 0 with any ground truth annotation. Model performance was systematically evaluated at confidence thresholds of 0.10 and 0.05. ResultsAt a confidence threshold of 0.05, the caries detection model achieved a mean precision of 84.41% ({+/-}0.72%), recall of 85.97% ({+/-}4.72%), and an F1-score of 85.13% ({+/-}2.61%). The alveolar bone loss model demonstrated exceptionally high performance, with a mean precision of 95.47% ({+/-}0.94%), recall of 98.60% ({+/-}0.49%), and an F1-score of 97.00% ({+/-}0.46%). ConclusionThe YOLOv8-based models demonstrated high accuracy and high sensitivity for detecting dental caries and alveolar bone loss on periapical radiographs. The system shows significant potential as a reliable automated assistant for dental practitioners, helping to improve diagnostic consistency, reduce the risk of missed pathology, and ultimately enhance the standard of patient care.

IntroductionDigital technologies are reshaping how health professionals are trained, and extended reality (XR) has gained attention as a tool for skills development in dental education. Yet, successful integration depends largely on educators perceptions, readiness, and working conditions. This study aimed to explore dental educators views of the educational value of XR, what barriers they experience, and how familiarity with immersive technologies relates to their use in teaching. Materials and MethodsA cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted among dental educators. The questionnaire included items on demographics, familiarity and frequency of XR use, and perceptions of educational value, barriers, and curricular integration. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and Spearman correlation analyses were performed to explore associations between familiarity, use, and perceived benefits of XR. ResultsRespondents reported positive attitudes toward XR, particularly for improving students understanding of complex anatomy (mean = 6.02/7), skill development (5.68/7), and confidence and preparedness for clinical practice (5.08-5.20/7). XR was mainly viewed as a complement to traditional teaching rather than a replacement (mean = 3.77/7). Strong correlations were observed between perceived improvements in confidence, skills, and clinical readiness (r = 0.71 - 0.89, P < 0.0001). High costs, limited technical support, and time constraints were the most prominent barriers to usage. ConclusionOverall, dental educators appear open to XR but constrained by structural and organizational factors rather than a lack of interest. Faculty development, hands-on training opportunities, and institutional support may therefore be essential to translating positive perceptions into meaningful and sustained integration of immersive technologies in dental curricula.

Acidification of the oral environment has been implicated in the initiation and progression of oral pathologies including oral cancer, but how acidic environments modulate normal oral epithelial cell (OEC) responses to microbial ligands is not understood. This study examined the impact of acidic stress on OEC morphological, molecular, and functional responses to toll-like-receptor ligand engagement in vitro. OEC cultures were exposed to either normal (pH:=:8.0) or acidified growth media (pH:=:3.0) for 24 hours prior to machine-learning-guided morphological analysis and exposure to either toll-like receptor (TLR)5 (flagellin) or TLR2/TLR1 (Pam3CSK4) agonists. Multiplex gene expression technology was used to quantify the transcriptional responses of metabolic-and immune-related genes at 6 hours post-TLR agonist exposure. OEC-mediated production of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-{beta}) was assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at 2-, 6-, and 24-hours post-agonist exposure. Results showed that acid exposure induced significant changes to OEC morphology resembling epithelial-mesenchymal transition, the differential expression of n=197 metabolic-and n=43 immune-related genes and significantly increased OEC TGF-{beta}1 production. The results demonstrate that acid stress skews normal OECs towards pro-inflammatory and pro-oncogenic phenotypes when faced with concomitant microbial ligand challenge and provide key molecular clues to OEC survival strategies with potential implications for elucidating the early molecular events in the development of epithelial dysplasia. Article HighlightsO_LIAcute acid exposure reduces survival of OECs C_LIO_LIA subpopulation of OECs is resistant to acid-mediated cell loss and undergo morphometric changes consistent with epithelial-mesenchymal transition C_LIO_LIConcurrent acid stress and TLR stimulation modulates transcription of immune and metabolic genes in OECs C_LIO_LIAcid stress increases TGF-{beta}1 protein production of OECs following TLR agonist stimulation C_LI

BackgroundConventional clinical indicators of periodontitis progression detect disease after irreversible tissue destruction has occurred. Molecular biomarkers in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) offer potential for earlier detection, but existing analytical approaches rely on cross-sectional snapshots that fail to capture the temporal dynamics of disease evolution. AimTo develop and validate a temporal deep learning framework leveraging longitudinal GCF protein profiles for (1) regression-based prediction of clinical attachment level (CAL) and probing depth (PD) changes, (2) current-visit classification of periodontitis progression, (3) next-visit prediction of progression with a 2-month clinical lead time, and (4) identification of the most informative biomarkers through systematic multi-method feature importance analysis. Materials and MethodsThis study utilized longitudinal GCF data from a prospective cohort of 413 participants (501 periodontal sites, 3,792 time-series observations) with 64 protein biomarkers measured at 2-month intervals over 12 months. A compact encoder-gated recurrent unit (GRU)-decoder architecture was developed through systematic experimentation across four phases, benchmarking temporal deep learning against cross-sectional machine learning baselines. Task-specific decoders addressed continuous regression (CAL and PD prediction) and binary classification (progression detection). Model development and reporting followed the TRIPOD+AI guidelines. ResultsThe temporal GRU achieved 47.7% CAL mean absolute error (MAE) reduction (1.139 to 0.596 mm) and 41.0% PD MAE reduction (0.902 to 0.532 mm) over linear regression baselines through the systematic model development progression. For binary classification, the model achieved AUC-ROC of 0.886 for current-visit classification and 0.867 for next-visit prediction with a 2-month lead time. Per-visit analysis revealed progressive improvement in both regression and classification accuracy as longitudinal data accumulated. Cross-method feature importance analysis identified Periostin, VEGF, MMP-2, IL-1RA, and MCP-4 as core predictive biomarkers, with divergent profiles between diagnostic and prognostic tasks suggesting distinct molecular signatures for concurrent versus incipient progression. ConclusionsTemporal deep learning applied to longitudinal GCF protein profiles enables both accurate regression prediction of clinical parameters and reliable classification of progression status, including 2-month-ahead forecasting suitable for clinical intervention planning. The compact architecture and non-invasive sampling approach make this framework suitable for integration into point-of-care periodontal monitoring workflows. Clinical RelevanceConventional clinical indicators of periodontitis progression, including probing depth changes, attachment loss, and radiographic bone loss, inherently detect disease after irreversible damage has occurred. This study shows that a compact deep learning model analyzing temporal GCF protein profiles can first accurately predict continuous changes in pocket depth and attachment loss, then classify progression status 2 months in advance, enabling proactive intervention before clinical manifestation of tissue destruction.

Objectives: Accurate assessment of orthognathic surgical accuracy is essential in the evaluation of operative techniques. Surgical accuracy is often reported as rotational and translational deviations from planned positions. This results in 6 separate values, translation in three planes, anterior-posterior (AP), superior-inferior (SI) and medial-lateral (ML) and rotations about three axes, pitch, roll and yaw. However, rotations will influence 3-dimensional positions and translational discrepancies. Methods: We have derived a mathematical formula using Euclidean geometry and quadratic functions that quantifies the impact of rotations on translational discrepancies. This allows for the calculation of a total discrepancy value that incorporates the three translations and rotations. Furthermore, we developed an interactive web-based application using the open-source shiny R package. Results: We have successfully reduced equations from Euclidean geometry into a quadratic form. The equation is as follows, [4(sin{theta}/2)2-2]x2 + [8d(sin{theta}/2)2-2d]x + 4d2(sin{theta}/2)2 = 0, where {theta} represents the rotational discrepancy in radians and d represents the translation discrepancy. This allows us to solve for the correction needed to be made to translational discrepancies to account for the influence of rotational discrepancies. We successfully developed a web application with a user-friendly graphical user interface. Clinicians upload their own data in the excel (.xlsx) file format and the application automatically performs the necessary calculations over many patients, returning a downloadable table of results. Conclusion: We present a mathematical formula incorporated into a web-application to combine translational and rotational discrepancies for deeper insight when evaluating orthognathic surgical accuracy. Clinical Relevance: This allows surgeons to account for rotational influence on 3-dimensional translational discrepancies.

BackgroundThe use of fluoride-containing dentifrices can reduce the risk of dental caries. The systematic review was conducted to address two research questions: (i) the prevalence and frequency of fluoridated toothpaste use among Nigerian children and adolescents across geographic and demographic settings, and (ii) its association with dental caries prevalence, stratified by location and baseline caries risk. MethodsThis systematic review, registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022362116), followed the PRISMA guidelines. A PIO framework was applied to include children and adolescents (6 months-19 years) in Nigeria using fluoridated toothpaste, with caries outcomes measured via dmft/DMFT indices. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, AJOL, and Google Scholar was conducted from January 2001 to January 2026, supplemented by reference and grey literature searches. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using an adapted Hoy et al. tool were performed independently by multiple reviewers, with high inter-rater reliability (Kappa=0.90). Data were pooled using a random-effects model, with sensitivity, subgroup, and meta-regression analyses conducted to explore heterogeneity and effect modifiers. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Eggers test. ResultsOf 1,194 identified records, 18 studies (n=12,719 participants) were included. The use of fluoridated toothpaste was widespread (prevalence: 61.9% to 95.8%), yet its association with dental caries varied significantly by location. A meta-analysis of 14 studies indicated a significant 16% reduction in caries odds with fluoridated toothpaste use after removal of an influential outlier (OR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.71-0.99, p=0.04). Subgroup analyses revealed this protective association was significant in urban and rural settings (p<0.05) but absent in suburban Nigeria. Furthermore, dental caries prevalence and severity (DMFT/dmft) were substantially higher in urban and rural areas, where the association was significant, compared to suburban regions. All studies were assessed as having a low risk of bias, and no significant publication bias was detected. ConclusionFluoridated toothpaste is widely used in Nigeria and associated with a reduction in the prevalence of dental caries in Nigeria. It appears the relationship is moderated by residential location, and the DMFT/dmft. Longitudinal studies are needed to explore the interactions between the DMFT/dmft, use of fluoridated toothpaste, and residential location in Nigeria.

BackgroundScalable, non-invasive markers for cognitive-decline risk are limited. Olfactory dysfunction is predictive, and oral dysbiosis is mechanistically linked to neurocognitive pathways. Hence, we tested whether pairing smell and global cognition with salivary microbiome profiling yields a targeted, clinically useful signal. MethodsWe enrolled 113 Memory Center attendees and community controls. Same-day MMSE, UPSIT, and saliva were obtained for 16S rRNA gene sequencing and cytokine measurement. Unsupervised k-means clustering on standardized MMSE-UPSIT defined two groups of participants: CNN (cognitively normal, normosmia) and CIH (cognitively impaired, hyposmia). Ordination and elastic-net models adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and sequencing depth. Functions were inferred with PICRUSt2 and were integrated with taxa via DIABLO. ResultsOverall, the 16S-based microbial community structure was similar between groups, indicating minor compositional shifts. CIH showed enrichment of periodontal anaerobes (Porphyromonas, Treponema and Prevotella), whereas CNN retained nitrate-reducing commensals (e.g. Neisseria subflava, Aggregatibacter aphrophilus). Functional shifts showed mixed consistency with literature, aligning for outer membrane usher proteins and alkyldihydroxy phosphate synthase, but diverging for thiaminase, alpha-glucuronidase, and chemotaxis protein CheX. Most salivary cytokines levels did not differ between groups. ConclusionsThis integrated smell, cognition, and saliva workflow delineates an olfactory- cognitive phenotype linked to a targeted, potentially modifiable salivary dysbiosis, periodontal anaerobes vs nitrate-reducers, rather than diffuse salivary inflammatory elevation. This approach may support non-invasive triage and monitoring along the oral- brain axis, pending independent, longitudinal validation.